Last week some fascinating new research
was published by WARC.com regarding the media consumption habits of
African Americans, Asians/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics in the
United States. The findings have serious implications for media
planners, since they point to strong
differences in behaviour amongst these ethnic groups.
Any research that points to consistent
correlation between multiple variables is useful. Yet as an
anthropologist I feel uneasy about an ethnicity-based segmentation in
the 21st century – for reasons that have nothing to do with
political correctness.
‘Ethnicity’ is a funny term and
should not be used unquestionably. Like ‘race’ before it, it’s
the kind of word that derives its power from the assumption that it
is something physically engrained in us, passed down from our
predecessors. But ethnicity is not inherent. Rather, it is part of
our (also frustratingly fuzzy) ‘identity’ which is fluid,
situational and constructed in our daily lives – in the way we
dress, the food we eat, the language we speak and so on. It is
through such practices that we come to identify ourselves as
belonging to one group or another.
If we start talking about how media and
technology consumption affects identity we get into a whole new
ball-game. There is so much you need to take into account –
Facebook, online forums, Apple versus LG – the list could go on
forever. What’s more – the phenomenal speed with which technology
and media trends emerge and become mainstream means that the next big
thing is just around the corner. For a young American of Chinese
origin his iPhone and Twitter profile might well form a much greater
part of his identity than his grandparents’ immigration story.
A good segmentation is typically
predictive of consumer behaviour. If the present study helps media
planners devise more effective campaigns, it will have fulfilled its
role. My note of caution goes out more against the implicit
assumption inherent in this research – that ethnicity is a concrete
stable variable against which other variables can be plotted.
Instead, both ‘identity’ and ‘ethnicity’ have never been as
fluid and fast-changing as they are today, and media and technology
consumption are central to our ever-changing concept of ‘self.’
Just as segmentations used to be based
on demographic data such as age groups before we realised that needs
and attitudes are often more indicative of consumer behaviour, so too
ethnicity-based segmentations might fall behind with the times unless
we really understand the effect that ‘ethnicity’ has on consumer
‘identity,’ and what effect that, in turn, has on behaviour.
No comments:
Post a Comment